Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focus

 

More than 60% of the experiments fail to produce results or expected discoveries. From an objective point of view, this high percentage of “failed “ research generates high level pieces of knowledge. Generally, all these experiments have not been published anywhere as they have been considered useless for our research target. The objective of “The All Results Journals: Biology” focuses on recovering and publishing these valuable pieces of information in Biology. These key experiments must be considered vital for the development of science. They  are the catalyst for a real science-based empirical knowledge.

 

The All Results Journals: Biology is an online journal that publishes research articles after a controlled peer review. All articles will be published, without any barriers to access, immediately upon acceptance.

 

The experiments will have to be rigorously conducted and repeatable. To that end, every single submitted work should have a discussion section in which a reasonable explanation concerning the reasons why certain results have appeared. Submitted papers for the journal will be peer reviewed by experts in this field.

 

Scope

 

The journal will cover negative (or “secondary”) experiments coming from all disciplines of Biology (Botany, Cell Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Microbiology, etc). An article in The All Results Journals should be created to show the failed experiments tuning methods or reactions. Articles should present experimental discoveries, interpret their significance and establish perspective with respect to earlier work of the author. It is also advisable to cite the work where the experiments has already been tuned and published.

 

Section Policies

Editorial

Editors
  • David Alcantara, The All Results Journals
Unchecked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Articles

Editors
  • David Alcantara, The All Results Journals
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Reviews

Editors
  • David Alcantara, The All Results Journals
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

ECOLOGY

Editors
  • Carlos Juan Ceacero Ruiz, University of Cordoba
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every single contribution submitted to The All Results Journals and selected for a peer-review will be sent to, at least, one reviewer, though usually could be sent to two or more independent reviewers, selected by the editors and sometimes by more if further advice is required (e.g., on statistics or on a particular technique). Authors are welcome to suggest suitable independent reviewers and may also request the journal to exclude certain individuals or laboratories.

 

The primary purpose of the review is to provide the editors with the information necessary to make a decision. The review should also instruct the authors on how to strengthen their paper up to the point where it should be acceptable. A negative review should explain to the authors the weaknesses of their manuscript, so that rejected authors are able to understand the basis for the decision and see, in broad terms, what needs to be done to improve the manuscript in order to be published anywhere.

 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Reviewer Recruitment

The All Results Journals operates a group of scholarly journals, covering the negative results in Chemistry, Biology, Nanotechnology and Physics. The full editorial board welcomes you to join us to be Reviewer.

Status: Part time                              Working language: English

Working style: Internet-based          Payment: Voluntary job, no payment

Description

Participation in the peer-review process is absolutely essential to the success and reputation of the journals. Reviewers along with the editors determine which work is of quality and significance. Due to extensive readership, the research and scholarship presented will ultimately have an impact on literacy in classrooms, nationally and internationally.

Reviewer's name will be listed in the on the journal's webpage.

Requirements

a). possess a doctoral degree in the specific subject related closely to the journal;
b). hold a job at a university or academic organization, in a teaching or research position;
c). be fluent in academic and professional English;
d). have a strong interest in scholarly journal;
e). work quickly and accurately to tight deadlines.

How to apply

1. Complete application form   download here.
2. Send your application form to the journal's E-mail address:  arjournals@arjournals.com

 


This website is optimized for the last versions of Internet Explorer (V. 7 or higher) and Firefox. We therefore advise to download (or upgrade your internet browser to) IE 7 or Firefox. All rights reserved to The All Results Journals (c).


To help promote The All Results Journals you can now download our poster and display it in your library, common room, office or laboratory.